Which of the following is not a definition of power?

The correct answer points to the notion that predicting the strategies of one's opponents does not fit the traditional definitions of power. In social work and discussions about power, the focus is usually on the influence and capacity one has to enact change or assert influence in various contexts.

The first definition indicates that power involves an individual’s capability to bring about their values and aspirations, showcasing an active role in shaping one's environment and the realization of personal goals. The second one clarifies that power can involve the ability to enforce moral claims, indicating that having power also means holding the authority to mandate or advocate for specific ethical stances. The fourth definition emphasizes resilience and determination, illustrating power as the capacity to maintain one's will, even when faced with opposition.

In contrast, predicting an opponent's strategies is more about anticipating behavior and responses rather than actively exerting influence or control, which is why it does not align with conventional definitions of power in this context. This distinction highlights that while understanding an opponent's strategies may be a tactical advantage, it does not constitute an expression or definition of power itself.